4.3 Article

Time for remodeling: SNF2-family DNA translocases in replication fork metabolism and human disease

期刊

DNA REPAIR
卷 95, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.102973

关键词

DNA damage; Replication stress; Replication fork remodeling; Genomic instability; Innate Immunity; Cancer

资金

  1. NIH [R01CA197774, R01CA227450, R01GM117064, T32CA009503]
  2. NSF GRFP Fellowship [DGE-16-44869]
  3. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) post-doctoral research fellowship
  4. European Molecular Biology Organisation (EMBO) Long-Term Fellowship [ALTF 366-2019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the course of DNA replication, DNA lesions, transcriptional intermediates and protein-DNA complexes can impair the progression of replication forks, thus resulting in replication stress. Failure to maintain replication fork integrity in response to replication stress leads to genomic instability and predisposes to the development of cancer and other genetic disorders. Multiple DNA damage and repair pathways have evolved to allow completion of DNA replication following replication stress, thus preserving genomic integrity. One of the processes commonly induced in response to replication stress is fork reversal, which consists in the remodeling of stalled replication forks into four-way DNA junctions. In normal conditions, fork reversal slows down replication fork progression to ensure accurate repair of DNA lesions and facilitates replication fork restart once the DNA lesions have been removed. However, in certain pathological situations, such as the deficiency of DNA repair factors that protect regressed forks from nuclease-mediated degradation, fork reversal can cause genomic instability. In this review, we describe the complex molecular mechanisms regulating fork reversal, with a focus on the role of the SNF2-family fork remodelers SMARCAL1, ZRANB3 and HLTF, and highlight the implications of fork reversal for tumorigenesis and cancer therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据