4.7 Article

Consistency of aquatic enclosed experiments: The importance of scale and ecological complexity

期刊

DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 524-532

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13213

关键词

gammarids; heatwaves; laboratory experiment; large‐ scale experiments; mesocosm; small‐ scale experiment

资金

  1. Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compared the effects of marine heatwaves on two gammarid species using different scales and ecological complexities of experiments. Results showed differences in abundance and population growth between experimental types for one species, but no difference in heatwave impacts on either species. The importance of space, density-dependent effects, biotic interactions, and natural environment complexity in buffering or boosting the direct effects of environmental stress on organisms was highlighted.
Aim Marine and freshwater ecosystems are increasingly threatened by human activities. For over a century, scientists have been testing many biological, chemical and physical questions to understand various ecosystems and their resilience to different stressors. While the majority of experiments were conducted at small-scale laboratory settings, lately large mesocosm experiments have become more and more common. Yet, it still remains unclear how the scale (i.e. space) and ecological complexity (i.e. community versus limited number of species) of experiments affect the results and to what extent different experimental types are comparable. Innovation Here, we conducted two types of experiments, run at different scale and ecological-complexity levels (i.e. outdoor large-scale community-level mesocosm versus indoor small-scale two-species laboratory experiment), to assess the effects of marine heatwaves on two gammarid species. Main Conclusions Our approach detected differences in abundance and relative population growth between the two experimental types for one out of the two tested species, but no difference in heatwave impacts on any of the species, independently of which experimental type was used. The larger space in the mesocosm, accompanied with inclusion of the community, benefited this species, demonstrating stronger performance in the mesocosm than in the laboratory experiment. Though, our study design cannot directly distinguish if scale or ecological complexity of the experiments, or both, caused the observed discrepancy in our findings. Furthermore, inconsistency in results among laboratory experiments complicates the extrapolations and generalization of the laboratory results. Yet, our findings indicate the importance of space, density-dependent effects, biotic interactions and complexity of natural environments in buffering, or boosting, the direct effects of environmental stress on organisms. Therefore, we urge the use of large-scale community-level mesocosm experiments instead of small-scale single-species laboratory ones whenever possible, and emphasize a necessity of great caution when interpreting the results of laboratory experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据