4.6 Article

Preparation of lignin-based carbon/polyaniline composites for advanced microwave absorber

期刊

DIAMOND AND RELATED MATERIALS
卷 111, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2020.108219

关键词

Lignin-based carbon; Polyaniline; Composite; Microwave absorption

资金

  1. Anhui Natural Science Foundation [1808085QB54]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M621989]
  3. Anhui Province Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017B216]
  4. Research Fund Anhui University of Science and Technology [ZY534]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows that lignin-based carbon/PANI composites exhibit excellent microwave absorption performance, suitable for both C-band and X-band, with a broader absorption bandwidth and higher absorption intensity compared to untreated lignin.
Lignin and polyaniline (PANI) as raw materials were pretreated and calcined to prepare a lignin-based carbon/ PANI composite microwave absorbent. The microscopic, structural, and microwave absorption performance of lignin-based carbon/PANI composites were investigated using X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and vector network analyzer. Results show that the optimized reflection loss (RL) of the lignin-based carbon/PANI composites is -50.96 dB, its matching thickness is 3.09 mm, and its effective absorption frequency range is 6.8-10.8 GHz (RL <-10 dB), covering C-band and X-band. Compared with untreated lignin, lignin-based carbon/PANI composites possess broader effective absorption bandwidth and higher absorption intensity. The outstanding absorption properties are closely related to the suitable impedance matching and the multiple loss mechanisms. This work can be used as the basis for the design and preparation of lignin-based and PANI polymer composites and serves as a feasible method for the design and synthesis of microwave absorbents with light weight and high performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据