4.5 Article

First-trimester maternal serum biomarkers and the risk of cerebral palsy

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY
卷 63, 期 2, 页码 183-189

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.14732

关键词

-

资金

  1. Lorenzo and Pamela Galli Medical Research Trust
  2. Victorian Department Health and Human Services
  3. Royal Children's Hospital Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that CP pregnancies had lower levels of PAPP-A and beta-hCG compared to control pregnancies. Abnormally low biomarker levels in CP pregnancies were associated with factors such as low Apgar scores, moderate preterm birth, and low birthweight.
Aim To investigate whether combined first-trimester screening (cFTS) biomarkers are associated with cerebral palsy (CP) and to identify CP characteristics associated with abnormal biomarker levels. Method In this retrospective case-control data linkage study, we matched mothers of 435 singletons with CP from a population register to their cFTS records and selected 10 singleton pregnancy controls per case. We compared mean and abnormal levels (expressed as multiples of the median [MoMs]) of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A), beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotrophin (beta-hCG), and nuchal translucency between cases and controls and between CP subgroups. Results Compared with control pregnancies, CP pregnancies had lower mean levels of PAPP-A (0.95 vs 1.01 MoM, p=0.02) and beta-hCG (0.93 vs 0.99 MoM, p=0.02). Biomarker levels in CP pregnancies were 1.8 times more likely to be associated with abnormally low levels of PAPP-A (p<0.01), 1.4 times for beta-hCG (p=0.12), and 2.6 times for low PAPP-A and beta-hCG together (p=0.04). In cases with CP, an abnormally low PAPP-A level was associated with moderate preterm birth, low Apgar scores, and Gross Motor Function Classification System level V. Low beta-hCG was associated with very low birthweight. Interpretation Low first-trimester biomarker levels suggest a role for early pregnancy factors in some causal pathways to CP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据