4.5 Review

Recent Developments in the Synthesis of Tetrazoles and their Pharmacological Relevance

期刊

CURRENT ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 388-403

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1385272824999201210193344

关键词

Tetrazole; isosteric substituent; biological activity; synthesis; structure-tautomerization; tetrazoles

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT) [SEP-82585]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The heterocycle ring tetrazole is an important structural moiety in medicinal chemistry, acting as a bioisosteric analogue of carboxylic acid and cis-amide groups. It exhibits a wide range of biological activities, including antiviral, antibacterial, anticancer, antifungal, and antioxidant properties. Various synthetic methods, such as using azide derivatives and different heterogeneous catalysts, have been developed to synthesize tetrazole derivatives.
The heterocycle ring tetrazole is an important moiety relevant to medicinal chemistry since it is present in some drugs with clinical importance. its primary biological activity is being a bioisosteric analogue of the carboxylic acid and cis-amide groups. Its metabolic stability and other physicochemical properties make it an attractive structure for designing and synthesizing new pharmaceuticals. The biological activity of tetrazoles is quite extensive and includes antiviral, antibacterial, anticancer, antifungal, and antioxidant properties; all of them are discussed in this review. The most effective way to obtain tetrazoles is by azide derivatives, either in the starting materials by the cycloaddition [3 + 2] of organic azides and nitriles or by preparing a reactive imidoyl azide intermediate. The nucleophilic behavior of the azide group is discussed when the raw materials include isocyanides. Some other methods include alternative synthetic routes like thermolysis. This review also highlights some of the developments regarding the use of different heterogeneous catalysts to synthesize several tetrazole derivatives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据