4.4 Review

An update on the microbiome in vasculitis

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 15-23

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000758

关键词

antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis; dysbiosis; giant cell arteritis; microbiome; vasculitis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have shown that patients with small, medium, and large vessel vasculitis have dysbiosis and reduced microbial diversity in their microbiomes. Patients with vasculitis tend to have more pathogenic bacteria and fewer commensal bacteria.
Purpose of review To summarize recent evidence regarding the presence and potential role of the microbiome in systemic vasculitides. Recent findings Microbiomic descriptions are now available in patients with small, medium and large vessel vasculitis. The majority of studies have evaluated gastrointestinal inhabitants, with a smaller number of studies describing the nasal, pulmonary or vascular microbiomes. Most published studies are observational and cross-sectional. Dysbiosis is seen frequently in vasculitis patients with reduced microbial diversity observed in nasal, fecal and vascular samples compared with disease and/or healthy controls. Predominant bacteria vary, but overall, patients with vasculitis tend to have more pathogenic and less commensal bacteria in active disease. In the few longitudinal studies available, improvement or resolution of dysbiosis has been observed following vasculitis treatment and improved disease activity. Dysbiosis and reduced microbial diversity has been identified in patients with small, medium and large vessel vasculitis. Although limited data suggests microbiomes may 'normalize' following immunosuppression, cause or effect cannot be determined. It is hypothesized that microbial disruption in a genetically susceptible individual may trigger excessive host immune activation and vasculitis; however, larger studies with longitudinal and translational design are needed to further our current understanding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据