4.1 Review

Transesophageal echocardiography for perioperative management in thoracic surgery

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY
卷 34, 期 1, 页码 7-12

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000947

关键词

lung transplant; pulmonary thromboendarterectomy; thoracic surgery; transesophageal echocardiogram

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [K23DA040923]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review highlights the recent findings on the utilization of TEE during thoracic surgical procedures, emphasizing its common use in high-risk surgeries like lung transplantation and pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. While TEE is not usually required for common thoracic surgeries, it may be used to elucidate reasons for acute hemodynamic instability without apparent cause. Most recommendations in this field are expert opinion-based, and routine use of TEE in thoracic surgery is often limited to specific high-risk patients and procedures.
Purpose of review Perioperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is most often employed during cardiac surgery. This review will summarize some of the recent findings relevant to TEE utilization during thoracic surgical procedures. Recent findings Hemodynamic monitoring is a key component of goal-directed fluid therapy, which is also becoming more common for management of thoracic surgical procedures. Although usually not required for the anesthetic management of common thoracic surgeries, TEE is frequently used during lung transplantation and pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. Few clinical studies support current practice patterns, and most recommendations are based on expert opinion. Currently, routine use of TEE in thoracic surgery is often limited to specific high-risk patients and/or procedures. As in other perioperative settings, TEE may be utilized to elucidate the reasons for acute hemodynamic instability without apparent cause. Contraindications to TEE apply and have to be taken into consideration before performing a TEE on a thoracic surgical patient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据