4.8 Article

TORC1 Determines Fab1 Lipid Kinase Function at Signaling Endosomes and Vacuoles

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 31, 期 2, 页码 297-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.10.026

关键词

-

资金

  1. DFG [UN111/10-1]
  2. Canton of Fribourg
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [310030_166474/184671, 310030_184781, 316030_177088]
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds
  5. graduate program of the Collaborative Research Center 944 [SFB 944]
  6. Department of Biology/Chemistry Osnabruck
  7. FWO Vlaanderen, Belgium [SB-FWO 1S06419N]
  8. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030_166474, 316030_177088, 310030_184781] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  9. MRC [MC_UU_00012/6] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals a regulatory feedback loop between TORC1 and the Fab1 complex that controls signaling at endolysosomes.
Organelles of the endomembrane system maintain their identity and integrity during growth or stress conditions by homeostatic mechanisms that regulate membrane flux and biogenesis. At lysosomes and endosomes, the Fab1 lipid kinase complex and the nutrient-regulated target of rapamycin complex 1 (TORC1) control the integrity of the endolysosomal homeostasis and cellular metabolism. Both complexes are functionally connected as Fab1-dependent generation of PI(3,5)P-2 supports TORC1 activity. Here, we identify Fab1 as a target of TORC1 on signaling endosomes, which are distinct from multivesicular bodies, and provide mechanistic insight into their crosstalk. Accordingly, TORC1 can phosphorylate Fab1 proximal to its PI3P-interacting FYVE domain, which causes Fab1 to shift to signaling endosomes, where it generates PI(3,5)P-2. This, in turn, regulates (1) vacuole morphology, (2) recruitment of TORC1 and the TORC1-regulatory Rag GTPase-containing EGO complex to signaling endosomes, and (3) TORC1 activity. Thus, our study unravels a regulatory feedback loop between TORC1 and the Fab1 complex that controls signaling at endolysosomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据