4.4 Article

Activation energy of hydrogen desorption from high-performance titanium oxide carrier-selective contacts with silicon oxide interlayers

期刊

CURRENT APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 21, 期 -, 页码 36-42

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2020.10.002

关键词

Surface passivation; Silicon; Titanium oxide; Atomic layer deposition; Hydrogen; Thermal desorption spectroscopy

资金

  1. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO), MEXT [JP18H05514]
  2. Inter-University Cooperative Research Program of the Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University [18K0093]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The impact of hydrogen desorption on the electrical properties of TiOx on crystalline silicon with SiOy interlayers was studied, showing that lower surface recombination velocity and contact resistivity can be obtained by using SiOy interlayers. Different hydrogen desorption energies suggest the excellent passivation effect of TiOx/SC2-SiOy/c-Si heterocontacts.
The impact of hydrogen desorption on the electrical properties of TiOx on crystalline silicon (c-Si) with SiOy interlayers is studied for the development of high-performance TiOx carrier-selective contacts. Compared with the TiOx/c-Si heterocontacts, a lower surface recombination velocity of 9.6 cm/s and lower contact resistivity of 7.1 m Omega cm(2) are obtained by using SiOy interlayers formed by mixture (often called SC2). The hydrogen desorption peaks arising from silicon dihydride (alpha 1) and silicon monohydride (alpha 2) on the c-Si surface of the as deposited samples are observed. The alpha 1 peak pressure of as-deposited heterocontacts with SiOx interlayers is lower than that of heterocontacts without a SiOy interlayer. Furthermore, the hydrogen desorption energies are found to be 1.76 and 2.13 eV for the TiOx/c-Si and TiOx/SC2-SiOy/c-Si heterocontacts, respectively. Therefore, the excellent passivation of the TiOx/SC2-SiOy/c-Si heterocontacts is ascribed to the relatively high rupture energy of bonding between Si and H atoms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据