4.6 Review

Efficacy of intravenous NEPA, a fixed NK1/5-HT3 receptor antagonist combination, for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) during cisplatin- and anthracycline cyclophosphamide (AC)-based chemotherapy: A review of phase 3 studies

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103143

关键词

NEPA; Netupitant; Palonosetron; CINV; Antiemetic; NK1 receptor antagonist

资金

  1. Helsinn Healthcare, SA, Lugano, Switzerland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the efficacy of intravenous NEPA with oral NEPA and other NK(1)RA regimens, showing that intravenous NEPA has significant advantages in the treatment of nausea and vomiting, potentially offering a safer and more effective option.
This paper presents an overview of the efficacy of intravenous (IV) NEPA (fixed combination of the NK(1)RA, fosnetupitant, and 5-HT3RA, palonosetron) relative to oral NEPA and also to historical data for other NK(1)RA regimens. Data is compiled from 5 pivotal NEPA studies in adult chemotherapy-naive patients with solid tumors undergoing either cisplatin- or anthracycline cyclophosphamide (AC)-based chemotherapy. Additionally, data was reviewed from 10 pivotal Phase 3 studies utilizing other NK(1)RA regimens approved for clinical use. The overall (0-120 h) complete response (no emesis, no rescue use), no emesis, and no significant nausea rates for IV NEPA were similar to that of oral NEPA and were consistently numerically higher than historical NK(1)RA regimens. As a single-dose prophylactic antiemetic combination given with dexamethasone, IV NEPA is a highly effective and convenient guideline-compliant antiemetic agent which may offer a safety benefit over other IV NK(1)RA regimens due to its lack of associated hypersensitivity and injection-site reactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据