4.7 Review

The gut microbiota as a target to control hyperuricemia pathogenesis: Potential mechanisms and therapeutic strategies

期刊

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION
卷 62, 期 14, 页码 3979-3989

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1874287

关键词

Hyperuricemia; gut microbiota; uric acid metabolism; transporters; probiotics; prebiotics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32001692]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyperuricemia is a metabolic disorder caused by abnormal uric acid metabolism, with the gut microbiota being identified as a new target for treatment. Mechanisms such as promoting purine and UA catabolism, increasing UA excretion, and regulating UA absorption in the intestine can help in treating HUA, along with the use of probiotics and prebiotics targeting the intestinal tract.
Hyperuricemia (HUA) is a metabolic disorder caused by abnormal uric acid (UA) metabolism, which is a complex physiological process involving multiple organs (liver, kidney, and intestine). Although UA metabolism in the liver and kidneys has been elucidated, only a few studies have focused on the process in the intestine. With our growing knowledge of the effects of gut microorganisms on health, the gut microbiota has been identified as a new target for HUA treatment. In this review, the relationship between HUA and the gut microbiota is elucidated, and anti-hyperuricemia mechanisms targeting the intestine are discussed, such as the promotion of purine and UA catabolism by the gut microbiota, increases in UA excretion by the gut microbiota and its metabolites, regulation of UA absorption or secretion in the intestinal tract by certain transporters, and the intestinal inflammatory response to the gut microbiota. Additionally, probiotics (Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli) and prebiotics (polyphenols, peptides, and phytochemicals) with UA-lowering effects targeting the intestinal tract are summarized, providing reference and guidance for further research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据