4.7 Article

Corrosion behavior and thermos-physical properties of a promising Yb2O3 and Y2O3 co-stabilized ZrO2 ceramic for thermal barrier coatings subject to calcium-magnesium-aluminum-silicate (CMAS) deposition: Experiments and first-principles calculation

期刊

CORROSION SCIENCE
卷 182, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2020.109230

关键词

Thermal barrier coatings (TBCs); Calcium-magnesium-alumina-silicate (CMAS); Rare earth doped; First-principles calculation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51775189]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality Project [16DZ2260604]
  3. Shanghai Space Science and Technology Innovation Fund [SAST 2019056]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study systematically investigated the corrosion behavior of Yb2O3-Y2O3 co-stabilized ZrO2 (YbYSZ) under CMAS melt attack, and found that YbYSZ exhibited better CMAS resistance than YSZ due to its excellent phase stability. The degradation of grain caused by CMAS attack was found to be greatly related to the diffusion rate of element, with Yb3+ demonstrating a low diffusion rate contributing to good phase stability. Additionally, YbYSZ showed a higher thermal expansion coefficient and lower thermal conductivity compared with YSZ.
In this study, corrosion behavior of Yb2O3-Y2O3 co-stabilized ZrO2 (YbYSZ) was systematically investigated under CMAS melt attack. The result was found that YbYSZ exhibited a better CMAS resistance than yttria stabilized zirconia (YSZ), which was attributed to the excellent phase stability. The degradation of grain caused by CMAS attack was greatly related to the diffusion rate of element substantially. Yb3+ exhibited a low diffusion rate contributing to good phase stability during corrosion. A corresponding first-principles calculation further confirmed this conclusion. Besides, YbYSZ showed a higher thermal expansion coefficient and lower thermal conductivity as compared with YSZ counterpart.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据