4.5 Article

Stir zone stress corrosion cracking behavior of friction stir welded AA7075-T651 aluminum alloy joints

期刊

CORROSION REVIEWS
卷 39, 期 1, 页码 55-62

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/corrrev-2020-0065

关键词

aluminum alloy; axial load; circumferential-notched tensile specimen; friction stir welding; stir zone; stress corrosion cracking

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST), SERB Division, Government of India, New Delhi [SB/FTP/ETA-281/2012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the stress corrosion cracking behavior of FSW AA7075-T651 joints. The threshold stress of the parent metal and stir zone were found to be 242 and 175 MPa, respectively.
AA7075 high-strength aluminum alloy, which has many applications in the aircraft, marine and automobile industries, happens to be susceptible to stress corrosion cracking (SCC) when exposed to corrosive environments, resulting in reduced service life of the components. Inappropriate fabrication processes may augment this behavior. The fabrication of AA7075 components using conventional fusion welding processes may produce defects that include hot cracking and porosity. Friction stir welding (FSW) is a solid-state joining process that can avoid these problems and being widely used for components made of aluminum alloys. Because the joining occurs at a temperature that is lower than the melting point of the material, solidification cracking defects can be eliminated. This study investigates the SCC behavior ofFSWAA7075-T651 joints. Horizontal-type SCC test was conducted on circumferential-notched tensile (CNT) specimens exposed to 3.5wt.% NaCl solutions under various axial stress conditions. The different regions of the fractured specimens, such as the machined notch, SCC region and region of ultimate mechanical failure were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to establish the mechanism of SCC. The threshold stress of parent metal (PM) and stir zone (SZ) of the FSW joint were found to be 242 and 175 MPa, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据