4.5 Article

Historical reconstruction of trace element concentrations and fluxes in a tropical coastal lagoon (Mexican Pacific) derived from 210Pb radiochronology

期刊

CONTINENTAL SHELF RESEARCH
卷 213, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2020.104315

关键词

Pb-210 dating; Coastal lagoon; Trace elements; Flux ratios; Pacific-Central America large marine ecosystem

资金

  1. Gestion Politica y Planificacion Ambiental, S.C., Mexico

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By analyzing Pb-210-dated sediment cores, the historical trends of trace element concentrations, enrichments and flux ratios in the Xola-Paraman Lagoon (XPL) of the Mexican Pacific coast were evaluated. The major processes controlling the variability of elements were identified as input of lithogenic materials, periodical marine-water intrusion, and complexation between metal ions and organic matter. Changes in trace element flux ratios over time closely reflected the intensification of agricultural activities around the lagoon and the impact of major tropical storms.
The historical trends of trace element concentrations, enrichments and flux ratios were evaluated through the analysis of three Pb-210-dated sediment cores from the tropical coastal system Xola-Paraman Lagoon (XPL), a Ramsar site at the Mexican Pacific coast. The depth profiles of lithogenic elements (Al, Si, Rb, Sr, Zr) were relatively homogeneous, while concentrations of trace elements, such as Ni, Cu, Zn, As and Pb, showed highest values during the last four decades. Only minor enrichments of Ni, Cu, Zn and As were observed. With a chemometric approach, we identified three major processes controlling the variability of elements among the sedimentary records: 1) input of lithogenic materials; 2) periodical marine-water intrusion and 3) complexation between metal ions and organic matter. The changes of trace element flux ratios over time closely reproduce the intensification of agricultural activities around the lagoon and the impact of major tropical storms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据