4.7 Article

Experimental investigation on the influence of multiscale pores on the static and dynamic splitting tensile strength of cementitious materials based on the virtual pore method

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 266, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120956

关键词

Splitting tensile strength; Porosity; Pore size; Rate effect; Rubber

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0404902]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52079047, 51479048]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019B73614]
  4. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [SJKY19_0456]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals the significant impact of pore size on the mechanical properties of cementitious materials, especially pores with radii larger than 100 nm. Materials with larger pores tend to exhibit a more pronounced rate effect and higher dynamic increase factor.
Mechanical properties of cementitious materials are closely related to their pore structures. The present study aims to determine the effect of pore size on the static and dynamic tensile strength of cementitious materials. Based on the virtual pore method, mortar samples with different porosity and pore size distribution were prepared, and their strength was measured. A series of models were proposed, which quantified the effect of pore size on static and dynamic splitting tensile strength and dynamic increase factor (DIF). It was revealed that pores with radii larger than 100 nm have a significant impact on strength. Specifically, pores with radii larger than 100 mu m dominate the effect on static strength, while the pores with radii of 100 nm-100 mu m dominate the effect on dynamic strength. At the same porosity, materials with larger pores tend to have a more pronounced rate effect and a higher DIF. The findings of this paper can be used as a reference for the design of cementitious materials. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据