4.7 Article

Effect of CaO content in raw material on the mineral composition of ferric-rich sulfoaluminate clinker

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 263, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120431

关键词

Ferric-rich sulfoaluminate cement; CaO; Phase composition; Iron-bearing phase

资金

  1. National Key Research & Development Program of China [2017YFC0703100]
  2. Shandong Provincial Major Scientific and Technological Innovation Project [2019JZZY020306]
  3. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ferric-rich calcium sulfoaluminate (FR-CSA) cement is an eco-friendly cement. Fe2O3 exists in different minerals of FR-CSA clinker, e.g., Ca4Al2Fe2O10 (C(4)AF), Ca2Fe2O5 (C2F), and Ca4Al6-2xFe2xSO16 (C(4)A(3-x)F(x)(S) over bar). The mineral composition depends on the chemical composition of the raw materials and significantly determines the reactivity of FR-CSA cement. To optimize the phase composition of the FR-CSA clinker, chemical reagent raw mixtures with different amounts of CaO were used to prepare the FR-CSA clinker. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, Rietveld quantitative phase analysis (RQPA), Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) were used to identify the mineralogical conditions of the FR-CSA clinker. The results indicated that the amounts of CaO in raw materials greatly affected the iron-bearing phase formation in the FR-CSA clinker. With decreasing CaO content involved in calcination reaction, the amounts of Fe2O3 incorporated in C(4)A(3-x)F(x)(S) over bar increased up to 17.72 wt% (where x = 0.36). The findings make it possible to optimize the mineral composition of the FR-CSA clinker by changing the CaO content in raw materials. Furthermore, low CaO content in the raw material is beneficial to the formation of C(4)A(3-x)F(x)($) over bar, which enables the use of solid wastes containing low calcium for producing FR-CSA cement. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据