4.7 Article

Upper bound solution for the bearing capacity of two adjacent footings on rock masses

期刊

COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS
卷 129, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103855

关键词

Bearing capacity; Upper bound solution; Hoek-Brown; Interference; Efficiency factor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effect of the adjacency of two strip footings on the bearing capacity of rock masses using upper bound analysis and finite element method. The research shows that the distance between the footings plays a significant role in how they interact with each other and affect the ultimate bearing capacity of the rock masses. By varying parameters, the maximum distance of mutual influence between the two footings and the impact of reducing the distance between footings on the bearing capacity can be determined.
In this paper, the effect of the adjacency of two strip footings on bearing capacity of rock masses was investigated using the upper bound analysis and finite element method. The modified Hoek-Brown nonlinear failure criterion was used for the rock mass. The effect of various parameters such as the distance between the two footings, Hoek-Brown parameters, surcharge pressure and unit weight of the rock mass on the ultimate bearing capacity of rock masses were also investigated. The results show that if the distance between the two footings is significant, the failure lines occur beneath each footing will not interfere with the failure lines beneath the other adjacent footing and each footing behaves as a single one. The maximum distance for which the two footings affect each other can be obtained from the charts presented in this paper. By reducing the distance between the two footings, the bearing capacity will increase firstly and then decrease. Finally, when the two footings touch each other, the ultimate bearing capacity of the two footings will be equal to the ultimate bearing capacity of a single isolated footing with a width twice the width of each footing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据