4.7 Article

ReliefNet: Fast Bas-relief Generation from 3D Scenes

期刊

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN
卷 130, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2020.102928

关键词

Bas-relief; Relief modeling; 3D scene; Height field; ReliefNet

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61572161, 61502129, 61972121]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Science and Technology Program in China [2018C01030]
  3. EPSRC [EP/J02211X/1]
  4. EPSRC [EP/J02211X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a fast bas-relief generation method based on deep learning, which eliminates the need for parameter tuning and maintains rich details. The proposed ReliefNet is designed to solve the essential problem of bas-relief modeling effectively, showcasing its performance through extensive experiments on various high-resolution 3D scenes.
Most previous methods of bas-relief generation run slow, or require tuning several important parameters. These issues seriously reduce the efficiency of bas-relief modeling. We introduce a fast generation method for high-quality basreliefs from 3D objects based on a deep learning technique. Unlike neural networks for image tasks, the proposed network for reliefs (ReliefNet) is elaborately designed to deal with a modeling problem in the field of graphics. We design our ReliefNet and equip it with a special loss function with the aim that the network can solve the essential problem of bas-relief modeling. Our network eliminates the height gaps and maintains the rich details simultaneously. The advantage over previous methods is that our method does not require parameter tuning and is a very efficient. Once the ReliefNet has been trained, a bas-relief can be produced by one feed-forward pass of the network instantly. To demonstrate the performance and effectiveness of our method, extensive experiments on a range of 3D scenes with high resolutions and comparisons to state-of-the-art methods are conducted. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据