4.7 Article

Adjoint optimization of pressurized membrane structures using automatic differentiation tools

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113393

关键词

Storm-surge barriers; Inflatable dams; Shape optimization; Kreisselmeier-Steinhauser function; FEniCS; Dolfin-adjoint

资金

  1. Princeton Environmental Institute at Princeton University
  2. Princeton University-University of Sao Paulo Collaborative Partnership

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an adjoint-based method for solving optimization problems involving pressurized membrane structures subject to external pressure loads. Shape optimization of pressurized membranes is complicated by the fact that, lacking bending stiffness, their three-dimensional shape must be sustained by the internal pressure of the inflation medium. The proposed method treats the membrane structure as an immersed manifold and employs a total Lagrangian kinematic description with an analytical pressure-volume relationship for the inflating medium. To demonstrate the proposed method, this paper considers hydrostatically loaded inflatable barriers and develops an application-specific shape parametrization based on the analytical inhomogeneous solution for the inflated shape of cylindrical membranes. Coupling this shape parametrization approach with the adjoint method for computing the gradients of functionals enables a computationally efficient optimization of pressurized membrane structures. Numerical examples include minimization and minimax problems with inequality and state constraints, which are solved considering both plane strain and general plane stress conditions. The numerical implementation leverages the high-level mathematical syntax and automatic differentiation features of the finite-element library FEniCS and related library dolfin-adjoint. The overall techniques generalize to a broad range of structural optimization problems involving pressurized membrane and thin shell structures. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据