4.5 Article

ICTC-RAAC: An improved web predictor for identifying the types of ion channel-targeted conotoxins by using reduced amino acid cluster descriptors

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2020.107371

关键词

Ion channel-targeted conotoxins; Reduced amino acid alphabet; Leaving-one method; ANOVA

资金

  1. National Nature Scientific Foundation of China [61702290, 61861036]
  2. Program for Young Talents of Science and Technology in Universities of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region [NJYT-18-B01]
  3. Fund for Excellent Young Scholars of Inner Mongolia [2017JQ04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conotoxins are small peptide toxins which are rich in disulfide and have the unique diversity of sequences. It is significant to correctly identify the types of ion channel-targeted conotoxins because that they are considered as the optimal pharmacological candidate medicine in drug design owing to their ability specifically binding to ion channels and interfering with neural transmission. Comparing with other feature extracting methods, the reduced amino acid cluster (RAAC) better resolved in simplifying protein complexity and identifying functional conserved regions. Thus, in our study, 673 RAACs generated from 74 types of reduced amino acid alphabet were comprehensively assessed to establish a state-of-the-art predictor for predicting ion channel-targeted conotoxins. The results showed Type 20, Cluster 9 (T = 20, C = 9) in the tripeptide composition (N = 3) achieved the best accuracy, 89.3%, which was based on the algorithm of amino acids reduction of variance maximization. Further, the ANOVA with incremental feature selection (IFS) was used for feature selection to improve prediction performance. Finally, the cross-validation results showed that the best overall accuracy we calculated was 96.4% and 1.8% higher than the best accuracy of previous studies. Based on the predictor we proposed, a user-friendly webserver was established and can be friendly accessed at http://bioinfor.imu.edu.cn/ictcraac.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据