4.7 Article

Cost-effective fabrication of bio-inspired nacre-like composite materials with high strength and toughness

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 202, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108414

关键词

Bio-inspired composites; Brick-and-mortar (BM); Micro-layered (mu L); Alumina/PMMA; Bi-directional freeze casting; Toughness

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) project [EP/S022813/1]
  2. Jordan University of Science and Technology for PhD scholarship
  3. EPSRC [EP/S022813/1, 2119900] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A cost-effective one-step densification process based on bi-directional freeze casting was investigated to produce nacre-like alumina/poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) composites with a unique micro-layered (mu L) architecture. This method has the advantage of shorter processing time, as it requires only sintering once instead of twice as in the fabrication of conventional brick-and-mortar (BM) composites via freeze casting. By tuning the processing parameters, composites with different ceramic content and layer thickness were obtained. The resultant mechanical properties of mu L composites showed that ceramic content and wall thickness affected mechanical properties significantly. The mu L composite with fine ceramic walls (8 mu m) and relatively high ceramic fraction (72 vol%) exhibited an exceptional combination of high flexural strength (178 MPa) and fracture toughness (12.5 MPa m(1/2)). The mu L composites were also compared with the conventional BM composites. Although the fracture behaviour of both composites exhibited similar extrinsic toughening mechanisms, the composites with longer ceramic walls displayed superior mechanical properties in terms of strength and fracture toughness in comparison with the BM composites comprising short ceramic walls (i.e. bricks), due to the effectiveness of stress transfer of load-bearing ceramic phase within the composites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据