4.7 Article

Improving ductility of bimodal carbon nanotube/2009Al composites by optimizing coarse grain microstructure via hot extrusion

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106198

关键词

Metal-matrix composites (MMCs); Carbon Nanotube; Mechanical properties; Extrusion

资金

  1. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS [QYZDJ-SSW-JSC015]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51931009, 51871214, 51871215]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2020197]
  4. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bimodal carbon nanotube reinforced 2009Al composites were prepared by powder metallurgy and extrusion, showing an increase in grain size with extrusion temperature in coarse grain bands and a double yield phenomenon. The extrusion temperature had a significant impact on the ductility and ultimate tensile strength of the composites, with higher temperatures leading to increased ductility and stable ultimate tensile strength.
Bimodal carbon nanotube reinforced 2009Al (CNT/2009Al) composites were fabricated by powder metallurgy followed with extrusion. It indicated that the width, length and grain size in the coarse grain (CG) bands increased with the increase of the extrusion temperature, while no obvious grain size change was observed in the ultra-fine grain zones. The bimodal composite showed a double yield phenomenon. The first yield strength which resulted from the yielding of the CG, was similar for all composites extruded with different temperatures. The second yield strength decreased, but the ultimate tensile strength retained stable and the elongation increased with increasing the extrusion temperature. The composite extruded at 470 degrees C exhibited a 76% ductility increase with nearly no ultimate tensile strength loss as compared to one extruded at 370 degrees C. The better stress relaxation ability of large-sized grains in the CG bands was believed to be the reason for the good strength-ductility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据