4.7 Article

Experimental study on compressive fatigue behavior and failure mechanism of 3D five-directional braided composites

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106097

关键词

Polymer-matrix composites (PMCs); Fatigue; Damage mechanics; Braiding

资金

  1. Excellent Young Scientist Foundation of NSFC [11522216]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11872087]
  3. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [2182033]
  4. Aeronautical Science Foundation of China [2016ZF51054]
  5. 111 Project [B14009]
  6. Project of the science and Technology Commission of Military Commission [17-16312-ZT-004-002-01]
  7. Foundation of Shock and Vibration of Engineering Materials and Structures Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province [18kfgk01]
  8. Foundation of State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures [SV2019-KF-32]
  9. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [YWF-19-BJ-J-55]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this research is to study the fatigue behaviors of 3D five-directional braided composites with different braiding angles subjected to longitudinal and transversal compression loads. Compressive fatigue tests were conducted under cyclic stress ratio of R = 0.1 with frequency at f = 5 Hz to study fatigue characteristics by establishing cyclic creep curves, hysteresis loop curves, peak stress ratio curves. The results show that parameters of braiding angle, load direction and stress level affected the fatigue behaviors of braided composite. With evolution of hysteresis loops, permanent strain increased gradually and deformation resistance ability of composites decreased, damage was further increasingly accumulated, the stiffness degradation characteristics was observed. The failure modes and damage evolution were identified by analyzing the evolving damage processes. Generally, the damages got serious with cracks propagation, matrix cracking, fibers breakage, interface debonding between fibers and matrix, which finally resulted in the structure damage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据