4.7 Article

Experimental and numerical investigation of Low-Velocity impact on steel wire reinforced foam Core/Composite skin sandwich panels

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 256, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112992

关键词

Reinforced Sandwich Panel; Steel Wire; Low-velocity Impact Test; Impact Strength; Energy Absorption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research investigated the effects of using steel wires on energy absorption of polyurethane foam core glass/epoxy skin sandwich panels through experimental and numerical methods, showing that the Star layout specimen is more effective in enhancing low-velocity impact behavior.
In the present research, the effects of using steel wires on energy absorption of polyurethane foam core glass/ epoxy skin sandwich panels have been investigated experimentally and numerically. Panels with different layouts of stainless steels between layers of upper skin were subjected to low-velocity impact tests with hemispherical steel impactor. The histories of energy absorption of reinforced and non-reinforced panels at the peak load of upper skin, and contact force and penetration of projectile during the impact test are obtained by experiment. Moreover, A Finite Element Analysis is performed using Abaqus/Explicit package. There is a good agreement between numerical and experimental results. The polyurethane foam core was modeled using VUMAT Subroutine and Ductile Criteria used for the evaluation of stainless steel wires. Besides, the impact behavior of these reinforced specimens compared by non-reinforced specimen, and Star layout specimen is observed to be more effective in enhancing the low-velocity impact behavior of sandwich panels compared with others. This layout can enhance the energy absorption of sandwich panels more than twice the non reinforced samples by only adding 10% of the weight of pure specimens. Consequently, the stainless steel wire reinforcement improves the impact resistance of these sandwich panels and could be cost-effective.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据