4.7 Article

Experimental and numerical investigation of weak, self-sustained conditions in engineered smouldering combustion

期刊

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
卷 222, 期 -, 页码 27-35

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.08.020

关键词

Smouldering combustion; Bitumen; Porous medium; Heat of Combustion; Heat Losses

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [CREATE 449311-14, RGPIN 2018-06464, RGPAS-2018-522602]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Engineered smouldering applications require self-sustaining conditions where the fuel is consumed without any addition of energy beyond ignition. In practical applications, it is preferred to create scenarios that are robust (i.e., far from extinction). In this work, smouldering column experiments were conducted, spanning conditions from robust self-sustaining through weak self-sustaining and to extinction by systematically lowering the applied air flux and the fuel concentration. A previously developed one-dimensional numerical model, which was validated under robust smouldering conditions, was used to simulate the experiments. Experiments showed front deformation in the weak and extinction cases due to multi-dimensional effects. This deformation resulted in a redistribution of the air flow, altering the global energy balance at the centre-line. The model was found to be unable to accurately reproduce these weak and extinction cases with the original validation parameters. A sensitivity analysis revealed that treating the heat of combustion as a fitting parameter, and letting it vary beyond its realistic maximum, enabled the model to create a condition of sufficient energy at the centre-line and was the best way to quantitatively simulate the weak and extinction cases for this specific scenario. This reveals that the model assumptions, particularly the assumption of one-dimensionality, are sufficient for robust smouldering but are insufficient for weakly self-sustaining scenarios. (C) 2020 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据