4.4 Article

On m-polar Diophantine Fuzzy N-soft Set with Applications

期刊

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1386207323666201230092354

关键词

m-polar Diophantine fuzzy N-soft sets; m-polar diophantine fuzzy N-soft set complements; (alpha, beta, gamma)-cut of m-polar diophantine fuzzy N-soft set; fuzzy sets; soft sets; intuitionistic sets

资金

  1. Anhui Jianzhu University. Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Intelligent Building & Building Energy Saving

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a novel hybrid model called m-polar Diophantine fuzzy N-soft set and defines its operations. The model proves to be more efficient and adaptable in managing uncertainties, overcoming the drawbacks of existing models. It generalizes several concepts and introduces the concept of m-polar Diophantine fuzzy N-soft sets.
Introduction: In this paper, we present a novel hybrid model m-polar Diophantine fuzzy N-soft set and define its operations. Methods: We generalize the concepts of fuzzy sets, soft sets, N-soft sets, fuzzy soft sets, intuitionistic fuzzy sets, intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets, Pythagorean fuzzy sets, Pythagorean fuzzy soft sets and Pythagorean fuzzy N-soft sets by incorporating our proposed model. Additionally, we define three different sorts of complements for Pythagorean fuzzy N-soft sets and examine few outcomes, which do not hold in Pythagorean fuzzy N-soft sets complements unlike to crisp set. We further discuss (alpha, beta, gamma) -cut of m-polar Diophantine fuzzy N-soft sets and their properties. Lastly, we prove our claim that the defined model is a generalization of the soft set, N-soft set, fuzzy N-soft set, intuitionistic fuzzy N soft set, and Pythagorean fuzzy N-soft set. Results: m-polar Diophantine fuzzy N-soft set is more efficient and an adaptable model to manage uncertainties as it also overcomes drawbacks of existing models, which are to be generalized. Conclusion: We introduced the novel concept of m-polar Diophantine fuzzy N-soft sets (MPDFNS sets).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据