4.3 Article

Weight gain post-heart transplantation is associated with an increased risk for allograft vasculopathy and rejection

期刊

CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14187

关键词

cardiac allograft vasculopathy; heart transplantation; obesity; rejection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study analyzed the impact of weight gain after heart transplantation on the development of cardiovascular disease, finding that weight gain, mainly contributed by fat mass, is associated with increased risk of cardiac allograft vasculopathy and rejection. Follow-up should focus on weight gain and preventive measures.
OBJECTIVE Obesity and overweight are associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Since fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) both contribute to total body weight (TBW), we characterized the post-heart transplantation (HT) change in TBW and its implications for outcomes. METHODS Post-HT changes in TBW, FM, and FFM were reviewed for 211 HT patients assessed during 1997-2017. Endpoints included cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and rejection. RESULTS Median TBW increased by 7.3% at 1 year, with a significant rise in the obese category (28% vs. 13%, p < 0.001) and with FM versus FFM making the main contribution (23% vs. 3%, p < 0.001). When patients were divided according to median TBW change (high vs. low), Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that 10-year freedom from CAV (log-rank p < 0.005) and rejection (log-rank p < 0.01) was significantly higher for the low TBW change group. Consistently, multivariable analyses showed that the high group was independently associated with significant 3.5-fold and 4.2-fold increased risks for CAV (95% CI 1.4-8.7, p = 0.01) and rejection (95% CI 1.2-15.4, p = 0.03), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Weight gain, contributed mostly by FM, is independently associated with an increased risk for CAV and rejection. Follow-up emphasis should be placed on weight gain and preventative measures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据