4.3 Article

Defluoridation studies with synthesized magnesium-incorporated hydroxyapatite and parameter optimization using response surface methodology

期刊

DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT
卷 57, 期 56, 页码 27294-27313

出版社

DESALINATION PUBL
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2016.1167628

关键词

Adsorption; Drinking water; Fluoride; Optimization; Response surface methodology

资金

  1. Malaviya National Institute of Technology (MNIT) Jaipur, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The severe impact of consumption of excess fluoride on human health has raised concerns for development of reliable materials for defluoridation of drinking water. This study deals with the synthesis of magnesium-incorporated hydroxyapatite (M-i-HAP) and evaluation of its defluoridation potential. Characterization studies revealed the bonding patterns, phase characteristics, and other microstructural details of the adsorbent synthesized, and the surface area was found to be 46.62m(2)/g. Response surface methodology was used for optimization of fluoride adsorption on the adsorbent and development of the predictive model. The optimum conditions evaluated using central composite statistical design for fluoride removal were found to be 303K, pH 7, 180min contact time, and 10g/L of M-i-HAP for treating fluoride solution of 10mg/L. At these conditions, the actual removal experimentally achieved was 94.5% which was very close to the maximum removal predicted by the model (94.60%). The process followed pseudo-second-order kinetic model and the adsorption mechanism can be described by Langmuir isotherm with an adsorption capacity of 1.16mg/g. The adsorbent was regenerated 91% using 0.1M NaOH solution. Drinking water quality was assessed for various parameters and the treated water was found to be fit for consumption with all parameters such as pH, total dissolved solids, total hardness, alkalinity, and turbidity within permissible limit as per World Health Organization and Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) guidelines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据