4.7 Article

Randomized Phase II and Biomarker Study of Pembrolizumab plus Bevacizumab versus Pembrolizumab Alone for Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 27, 期 4, 页码 1048-1057

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2500

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Ben and Catherine Ivy Foundation
  2. Jennifer Oppenheimer Cancer Research Initiative
  3. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck Co., Inc.
  4. NIH/NCI Cancer Center [P30 CA008748]
  5. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society [2322-19]
  6. NIH [R35CA197742, R01CA208205, U01CA224173]
  7. Ludwig Center at Harvard
  8. Jane's Trust Foundation
  9. National Foundation for Cancer Research
  10. Advanced Medical Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that pembrolizumab alone or in combination with bevacizumab had limited efficacy in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma, failing to improve patient survival rates. Tumor immune biomarkers were not reliable predictors of treatment outcomes, while baseline dexamethasone use and certain tumor biomarkers may impact treatment efficacy.
Purpose: VEGF is upregulated in glioblastoma and may contribute to immunosuppression. We performed a phase II study of pembrolizumab alone or with bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma. Patients and Methods: Eighty bevacizumab-naive patients with recurrent glioblastoma were randomized to pembrolizumab with bevacizumab (cohort A, n = 50) or pembrolizumab monotherapy (cohort B, n = 30). The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS-6). Assessed biomarkers included evaluation of tumor programmed death-ligand 1 expression, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte density, immune activation gene expression signature, and plasma cytokines. The neurologic assessment in neuro-oncology (NANO) scale was used to prospectively assess neurologic function. Results: Pembrolizumab alone or with bevacizumab was well tolerated but of limited benefit. For cohort A, PFS-6 was 26.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 16.3-41.5], median overall survival (OS) was 8.8 months (95% CI, 7.7-14.2), objective response rate (ORR) was 20%, and median duration of response was 48 weeks. For cohort B, PFS-6 was 6.7% (95% CI, 1.7-25.4), median OS was 10.3 months (95% CI, 8.5-12.5), and ORR was 0%. Tumor immune markers were not associated with OS, but worsened OS correlated with baseline dexamethasone use and increased posttherapy plasma VEGF (cohort A) and mutant IDH1, unmethylated MGMT, and increased baseline PIGF and sVEGFR1 levels (cohort B). The NANO scale contributed to overall outcome assessment. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab was ineffective as monotherapy and with bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma. The infrequent radiographic responses to combinatorial therapy were durable. Tumor immune biomarkers did not predict outcome. Baseline dexamethasone use and tumor MGMT warrant further study as potential biomarkers in glioblastoma immunotherapy trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据