4.8 Article

Current Indications for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Using Transcatheter Aortic Valves Valve-in-Valve, Valve-in-Ring, and Valve-in-Mitral Annulus Calcification

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 143, 期 2, 页码 178-196

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.048147

关键词

aortic valve; heart valve; mitral valve; surgery; transcatheter aortic valve replacement; transcatheter mitral valve replacement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The clinical use of TMVR using transcatheter aortic valves is limited to patients with failing bioprostheses or rings, and mitral valve disease associated with severe mitral annulus calcification. While valve-in-valve TMVR seems to be a reasonable alternative to surgery for high-risk patients, there is less evidence supporting valve-in-ring and valve-in-mitral annulus calcification interventions.
Use of transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) using transcatheter aortic valves in clinical practice is limited to patients with failing bioprostheses and rings or mitral valve disease associated with severe mitral annulus calcification. Whereas the use of valve-in-valve TMVR appears to be a reasonable alternative to surgery in patients at high surgical risk, much less evidence supports valve-in-ring and valve-in-mitral annulus calcification interventions. Data on the results of TMVR in these settings are derived from small case series or voluntary registries. This review summarizes the current evidence on TMVR using transcatheter aortic valves in clinical practice from the characteristics of the TMVR candidates, screening process, performance of the procedure, and description of current results and future perspectives. TMVR using dedicated devices in native noncalcified mitral valve diseases is beyond the scope of the article.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据