4.5 Article

Properties of B4C-TiB2 ceramics prepared by spark plasma sintering*

期刊

CHINESE PHYSICS B
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/abd7d8

关键词

boron carbide ceramics; conductivity; hardness; fracture toughness

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11704340, 11804305]
  2. Scientific and Technology Project in Henan Province, China [202102210198]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a series of B4C-TiB2 composite ceramics were prepared by doping TiH2 into B4C and sintering through SPS. The effects of sintering temperature and TiH2 content on the properties of the ceramics were investigated. Results showed that increasing TiH2 content improved the conductivity and toughness of the composite ceramics.
By doping titanium hydride (TiH2) into boron carbide (B4C), a series of B4C + x wt% TiH2 (x = 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20) composite ceramics were obtained through spark plasma sintering (SPS). The effects of the sintering temperature and the amount of TiH2 additive on the microstructure, mechanical and electrical properties of the sintered B4C-TiB2 composite ceramics were investigated. Powder mixtures of B4C with 0-20 wt% TiH2 were heated from 1400 degrees C to 1800 degrees C for 20 min under 50 MPa. The results indicated that higher sintering temperatures contributed to greater ceramic density. With increasing TiH2 content, titanium diboride (TiB2) formed between the TiH2 and B4C matrix. This effectively improved Young's modulus and fracture toughness of the composite ceramics, significantly improving their electrical properties: the electrical conductivity reached 114.9 S.cm(-1) at 1800 degrees C when x = 20. Optimum mechanical properties were obtained for the B4C ceramics sintered with 20 wt% TiH2, which had a relative density of 99.9 +/- 0.1%, Vickers hardness of 31.8 GPa, and fracture toughness of 8.5 MPa.m(1 / 2). The results indicated that the doping of fine Ti particles into the B4C matrix increased the conductivity and the fracture toughness of B4C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据