4.1 Article

Neurodevelopmental outcome of children born with an isolated atretic cephalocele

期刊

CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM
卷 37, 期 4, 页码 1295-1300

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-020-04997-6

关键词

Atretic cephalocele; Children; Development; Prenatal; Prognosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A follow-up study on children born with IAC showed that most of them had normal neurodevelopmental outcomes, without behavioral, social, or communication problems.
Purpose The existing data on the neurodevelopmental outcome of children born with an isolated atretic cephalocele (IAC) are scant. We aimed to expand upon these data by describing our experience with affected children, as well as assist parents and clinicians in deciding how to proceed when an IAC is diagnosed prenatally. Methods A follow-up study was conducted on nine children who were born with an IAC. Evaluations were performed by pediatric neurologists and child development specialists. Developmental outcomes were based on a global development evaluation that assessed gross and fine motor skills, receptive and expressive language levels, activities of daily living, communication skills, and social domains. Adaptive skills were estimated by the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System, Second Edition. Results None of the nine children (median age 4 years and 6 months) had abnormal findings on neurological examination. Six children had age-appropriate developmental milestones, two had a mild motor delay, and one had mild expressive language delay (catchup was achieved by all of the latter three by similar to 3.5 years of age). The mean general adaptive composite score was 105 +/- 11.7 (normal = 100). None of the children had behavioral, social, or communication problems. Conclusions Children diagnosed with an IAC with/without a falcine sinus and devoid of coexisting intracranial abnormalities seem to have a normal neurodevelopmental outcome. Continuation of pregnancy may be recommended when an IAC is detected prenatally, and reassurance if detected postnatally.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据