4.8 Article

Synthesis of a Stable Solid Acid Catalyst from Chloromethyl Polystyrene through a Simple Sulfonation for Pretreatment of Lignocellulose in Aqueous Solution

期刊

CHEMSUSCHEM
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 979-989

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202002599

关键词

biomass; lignocellulosic waste; pretreatment hydrolysis; solid acid catalyst; xylose

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFB1503801]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51676193, 51861145103, 51976224]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS [2017401]
  4. Hubei Key Laboratory of Industrial Fume and Dust Pollution Control [HBIK2018-04]
  5. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New and Renewable Energy Research and Development [Y909kn1001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SCPR140-1, a stable solid acid catalyst synthesized from chloromethyl polystyrene resin, showed high selectivity for xylose production and effectively deconstructed the structure of corncob during catalytic pretreatment. Compared to other similar reports, SCPR140-1 was not only synthesized through a simpler process but also demonstrated more stable catalytic activity during multiple recycling runs.
A stable solid acid catalyst, SCPR140-1, was synthesized from chloromethyl polystyrene resin (CPR) and used for catalytic pretreatment of corncob in aqueous solution. Under the optimized pretreatment condition, 73.07 % of xylose was directly obtained, and the enzymatic digestibility of treated residue reached up to 94.65 %, indicating that the SCPR140-1 had high selectivity for xylose production and effectively deconstructed the structure of corncob. The -CH2Cl group of CPR was substituted by -SO3H through the sulfonation, and the -SO3H was stably bound on the catalyst during the pretreatment process. Compared with other similar reports, the SCPR140-1 was not only synthesized through a simpler process but also had a more stable catalytic activity during multiple recycling runs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据