4.8 Article

Proton Conductive BaZr0.8-xCexY0.2O3-δ: Influence of NiO Sintering Additive on Crystal Structure, Hydration Behavior, and Conduction Properties

期刊

CHEMSUSCHEM
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 614-623

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202002369

关键词

Proton conductor; Barium zirconate; Barium cerate; Sintering additive; Co-sintering

资金

  1. Iketani Science and Technology Foundation [0311027-A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The addition of NiO in Y-doped BaZrO3, BaCeO3, and BaZr1-xCexO3 decreases dehydration temperature and proton concentration, leading to reduced ionic conductivity and transport number. This results in worse ion conductivity and brittle electrolyte in Ce-rich samples containing Ni.
Y-doped BaZrO3, BaCeO3 and BaZr1-xCexO3 show high proton conductivity at intermediate temperature and are promising electrolyte candidates in electrochemical devices. However, in most cases, the present cell fabrication process seems to be unavailable to avoid the addition of NiO, which is either added to improve the sinterability of these electrolyte or diffuses from the electrode substrate during co-sintering. In this work, a systematic investigation was performed to study the effect of NiO on BaZr0.8-xCexY0.2O3-delta (BZCY20) covering the full Ce range from 0 to 0.8. The results revealed that regardless of the composition of BZCY20, both the dehydration temperature and proton concentration decreased by adding NiO, which further greatly decreased the ionic conductivity and the transport number. And it is found that the redox cycles in Ce-rich samples containing Ni makes the grain boundary conductivity worse and the electrolyte brittle. The conclusion is that NiO is detrimental to the performance of the electrochemical cells using these materials as the electrolyte, although compromise might be achieved in certain degree by tuning the Ce content. However, it should be noted that to further improve the cell performance, a new sintering additive or new processing for cell fabrication is essential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据