4.5 Review

On the Effect of the Various Assumptions and Approximations used in Molecular Simulations on the Properties of Bio-Molecular Systems: Overview and Perspective on Issues

期刊

CHEMPHYSCHEM
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 264-282

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.202000968

关键词

boundary conditions; force field; long-ranged forces; molecular dynamics simulations; statistical-mechanical sampling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Computer simulations of molecular systems play a crucial role in chemistry, biology, and physics, but it is important to consider uncertainty and errors affecting the calculated properties; advantages and shortcomings of commonly used assumptions and approximations in simulating bio-molecular systems should be taken into account; developers can improve simulation quality by discussing ways to facilitate and expand research involving bio-molecular simulations.
Computer simulations of molecular systems enable structure-energy-function relationships of molecular processes to be described at the sub-atomic, atomic, supra-atomic or supra-molecular level and plays an increasingly important role in chemistry, biology and physics. To interpret the results of such simulations appropriately, the degree of uncertainty and potential errors affecting the calculated properties must be considered. Uncertainty and errors arise from (1) assumptions underlying the molecular model, force field and simulation algorithms, (2) approximations implicit in the interatomic interaction function (force field), or when integrating the equations of motion, (3) the chosen values of the parameters that determine the accuracy of the approximations used, and (4) the nature of the system and the property of interest. In this overview, advantages and shortcomings of assumptions and approximations commonly used when simulating bio-molecular systems are considered. What the developers of bio-molecular force fields and simulation software can do to facilitate and broaden research involving bio-molecular simulations is also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据