4.7 Article

Hexavalent chromium reduction by gallic acid

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 273, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129737

关键词

Hexavalent chromium; Reduction kinetics; Gallic acid; Polyphenols

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that gallic acid is effective in rapidly reducing Cr(VI) to Cr(III) in mild acidic conditions, following 2nd order kinetics in the pH range 3-5, with a different reduction mechanism observed at pH 5 and pH 6.
Cr(VI) is widely used in industry and often large quantities have been accidently or due to lack of precautions released at the environment. The presence of high concentrations of Cr(VI) in waste streams causes concern due to its toxicity and solubility. However the Cr(III) is a useful micronutrient in human diet. The reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) is a promising technology for a clean environment. Polyphenols are commonly found in plants and they are considered as strong natural antioxidants. In this study the reduction of hexavalent to trivalent chromium using gallic acid (GA), a polyhydroxyphenolic compound, was evaluated. The effect of pH, temperature, and Cr(VI) concentration on the kinetics of Cr(VI) reduction by GA were examined by conducting batch tests. It was found that reduction of Cr(VI) by GA is a rapid reaction under mild acidic conditions. Reduction was found to follow a 2nd order kinetics with respect to Cr(VI) concentration in the pH range 3-5. The results of the present study indicated that the treatment of contaminated waters with initial concentration of Cr(VI) 100 mu M by gallic acid, below the environmental limit of 0.96 mu M, required 20 min at pH 3 and 40 min at pH 4. At higher pH a different reduction mechanism seems to prevail and the required time for Cr(VI) reduction was approximately 10 h at pH 5 and 42 h at pH 6. The increase of temperature25 degrees C to 35 degrees C, at pH 6, was slightly accelerated the reaction. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据