4.5 Review

Scanning Protein Surfaces with DNA-Encoded Libraries

期刊

CHEMMEDCHEM
卷 16, 期 7, 页码 1048-1062

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.202000869

关键词

DNA-encoded libraries; drug development; peptidomimetics; protein– protein interactions; screening

资金

  1. DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) [BR 5049/7-1]
  2. Mercator Research Center Ruhr (MERCUR) [Pr-2016-0010]
  3. EFRE-NRW
  4. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the ligandability of a target protein is crucial for drug development projects, with DNA-encoded chemical libraries providing a tool to scan protein surfaces with large chemical space. DELs have uncovered various protein-protein interaction inhibitors and compounds binding to GPCRs and kinases, primarily consisting of chemically modified and cyclized peptides as well as functional small-molecule peptidomimetics.
Understanding the ligandability of a target protein, defined as the capability of a protein to bind drug-like compounds on any site, can give important stimuli to drug-development projects. For instance, inhibition of protein-protein interactions usually depends on the identification of protein surface binders. DNA-encoded chemical libraries (DELs) allow scanning of protein surfaces with large chemical space. Encoded library selection screens uncovered several protein-protein interaction inhibitors and compounds binding to the surface of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and kinases. The protein surface-binding chemotypes from DELs are predominantly chemically modified and cyclized peptides, and functional small-molecule peptidomimetics. Peptoid libraries and structural peptidomimetics have been less studied in the DEL field, hinting at hitherto less populated chemical space and suggesting alternative library designs. Roughly a third of bioactive molecules evolved from smaller, target-focused libraries. They showcase the potential of encoded libraries to identify more potent molecules from weak, for example, fragment-like, starting points.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据