4.7 Article

How physico-chemical and surface properties of cation-exchange membrane affect membrane scaling and electroconvective vortices: Influence on performance of electrodialysis with pulsed electric field

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 393, 期 -, 页码 102-114

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.09.011

关键词

Electrodialysis; Ion-exchange membranes; Scaling; Electroconvection; Pulsed electric field

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [210829409]
  2. RFBR, Russia [14-08-00642, 15-08-04522, 15-58-16005]
  3. FP7 CoTraPhen project [PIRSESGA-2010-269135]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two different lots of cation-exchange membranes (CMX-SB-1 and -2) were compared in terms of physicochemical and electrochemical properties. Further, electrodialysis with both membrane lots was carried out under pulsed electric field (PEF) on model solution containing Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions. It was found that CMX-SB-1 was more scaled with prevalence of Ca compounds on both membrane sides. CMX-SB-2 contained less scaling with prevalence of Ca compounds on diluate side and Mg compounds on concentrate side. The different behavior of membranes was hypothesized to be due to the differences in their intrinsic structure and surface properties. The CMX-SB-2 has higher concentration of fixed charges and water content, which cause larger size of inner channels and easier transport of Mg2+; the structural organization of CMX-SB-1 with presumably narrower nanochannels leads to the slower Mg2+ migration and their low quantity on CMX-SB-1 concentrate side. Additionally, the surface hydrophobicity and heterogeneity of CMX-SB-2 is higher than that of CMX-SB-1 what allow easier water slip on CMX-SB-2 surface facilitating electroconvection. Thus, more scaled CMX-SB-1 membrane with less developed electroconvection yielded lower values of demineralization (59.0% and 57.2% for 2 s/0.5 s and 2 s/0.67 s PEF respectively) than the less scaled CMX-SB-2 with better developed electroconvection (773% and 75.2% respectively). (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据