4.7 Article

Monolayer graphene transfer onto polypropylene and polyvinylidenedifluoride microfiltration membranes for water desalination

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 388, 期 -, 页码 29-37

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2016.02.027

关键词

Graphene membranes; Graphene transfer; Desalination; Interfacial polymerization; Ionic diffusion

资金

  1. KFUPM [CW-R5-08, CW-R10-09]
  2. King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, through the Centre for Clean Water and Clean Energy at MIT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transferof graphene to porous substrates with minimal defects is important for the fabrication of graphene membranes for water desalination. Here we investigated the transfer of monolayer chemical vapor deposition (CVD) graphene grown on copper (Cu) onto two commercial microfiltration membranes, namely polypropylene (PP) and polyvinylidenedifluoride (PVDF). The graphene layer was attached to the target substrate surface by sandwiching the Cu-graphene-membranes, followed by wet etching of the Cu substrate leaving behind the mono layer graphene on the membrane surface. SEM characterization indicated good transfer and surface coverage, but revealed the existence of defects within graphene layer which originated from the transfer process. Transport characteristics of the resulting graphene membranes were investigated by diffusion of potassium chloride (KCl) ions using a Side-bi-Side diffusion cell, graphene-PP membrane blocked 57% of KCl ions whereas graphene-PVDF membrane blocked 40% of the ions suggesting the presence of defects within graphene. An attempt to seal defects was carried out via interfacial polymerization (IP) of Nylon 6,6 into the defects using a Franz Cell, allowing sealing of defects and increasing KCl ion blockage to 67% for both membranes. The IP process was then optimized to seal the defects more effectively, which increased the ion blockage further to 84% for graphene-PP membranes. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据