4.6 Article

A Simple Route to the Synthesis of Pt Nanobars and the Mechanistic Understanding of Symmetry Reduction

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 27, 期 8, 页码 2760-2766

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202004104

关键词

CO-mediated synthesis; localized oxidative etching; particle coalescence; Pt nanobars; symmetry breaking

资金

  1. NSF [CHE-1804970]
  2. Georgia Institute of Technology
  3. NSF Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) [CHE-1560335]
  4. National Science Foundation [ECCS-2025462]
  5. U. S. Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A facile route to prepare tunable aspect ratio Pt nanobars by reducing Pt-IV precursor in DMF has been reported, where DMF decomposes to generate CO capable of passivating Pt{100} facets to promote nanobar formation, and PVP plays dual roles in controlling the size and aspect ratio of the nanobars. Mechanistic study indicates that anisotropic growth is a result of particle coalescence, localized oxidative etching, and preferential growth.
Noble-metal nanocrystals with anisotropic shapes have received increasing interest owing to their unique properties. Here, a facile route to the preparation of Pt nanobars with aspect ratios tunable up to 2.1 was reported by simply reducing a Pt-IV precursor in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) at 160 degrees C in the presence of poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP). In addition to its commonly observed roles as a solvent and a reductant, DMF could also decompose to generate CO, a capping agent capable of selectively passivating Pt{100} facets to promote the formation of nanobars. The size and aspect ratio of the nanobars could be tuned by varying the amount of Pt-IV precursor involved in the synthesis, as well as the concentration of PVP because of its dual roles as a stabilizer and a co-reductant. Our mechanistic study indicated that the anisotropic growth resulted from both particle coalescence and localized oxidative etching followed by preferential growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据