4.7 Review

0D to 3D carbon-based networks combined with pseudocapacitive electrode material for high energy density supercapacitor: A review

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 403, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126352

关键词

Carbon nanomaterials; Supercapacitor; Pseudocapacitor; Hybrid capacitor; Energy storage devices

资金

  1. National Research Foundation - Ministry of Science and ICT of Republic of Korea [2019R1A2C1004983, 2019R1A5A8080326]
  2. Science and Technology Innovation Commission of Shenzhen [JCYJ20180305125302333]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supercapacitors are reliable energy storage devices, but face limitations such as low capacitance and energy density. Carbon based nanocomposites have been extensively studied for their excellent properties. Developing high energy density supercapacitor devices remains a challenge despite advancements in research.
Supercapacitors are considered reliable devices for energy storage. However, supercapacitor has some limitations, such as relatively low capacitance and low energy density, which affect it as a promising energy storage device. In this context, carbon based nanocomposites have been widely studied in the past few years due to their excellent physical, mechanical and electrical properties. A lot of studies have been reported on carbon based materials with different 0D, 1D, 2D and 3D carbon nanostructures. The unique combination of pseudo-material with carbon material greatly improves the electrochemical performance of the composite as compared to individual candidate. However, developing high energy density supercapacitor devices with high cycling stability in a simple and cost effective way is still a challenge. This review provides the current progress on the carbon based pseudo-material composites for supercapacitor application in a well-systematic and easy manner which can guide the early researchers and emerging scientists dealing with or interested in supercapacitor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据