4.7 Review

Production, structural design, functional control, and broad applications of carbon nanofiber-based nanomaterials: A comprehensive review

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 402, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126189

关键词

Carbon nanofibers; Synthesis strategies; Functions; Biomedical engineering; Tissue engineering; Chemical engineering

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51873225, 21808116]
  2. Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province [tsqn201909104]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M662301]
  4. High-Grade Talents Plan of Qingdao University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon nanofibers (CNFs) have exhibited wide applications in the fields of materials science, nanotechnology, energy storage, environmental science, biomedicine, and others due to their unique structure, function, and properties. In this review, we present recent advance in the production and applications of various CNF-based nanomaterials. The methods for the production of CNFs are introduced firstly, and then different structures of CNFs related to corresponding synthesis methods are analyzed. In addition, the functional tailoring of CNFs by combining with other nanoscale building blocks such as nanoparticles, quantum dots, carbon materials, biomolecules, and others are demonstrated and discussed. Finally, the potential application of the CNF-based functional nanomaterials in the fields of supercapacitors, chemical batteries, solar cells, fuel cells, environmental adsorbents, sensors, biosensors, tissue engineering, antibacterial materials, electromagnetic interference shielding, and sharp memory materials are introduced and discussed in detail. It is expected this comprehensive review will not only help the readers to obtain the preliminary information on the production, modification, and applications of CNFs, but also promote the design and synthesis of novel CNF-based nanostructures and nanomaterials for advanced applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据