4.7 Article

Efficient wide bandgap all-polymer solar cells benefiting from a random n-type copolymers strategy

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 417, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.128000

关键词

All-polymer solar cells; Random copolymer; Fluorination; Morphology

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFE0108600]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Jiangsu Province [BZ2020011]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52073198, 51803144]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M651942]
  5. 111 project, Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, Soochow University
  6. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of random donor-acceptor conjugated polymers with varying difluorothiophene (FTh) substitution were designed and synthesized, achieving a best power conversion efficiency of 9.04% through optimizing crystallinity. This research provides insight into controlling polymer-polymer blends with desirable optoelectronic properties.
A series of random donor-acceptor conjugated polymers with naphthalene diimide and thiophene units were designed and synthesized with varying difluorothiophene (FTh) substitution. In comparison with the nonfluorinated polymer F0, FTh-containing random polymers exhibit increased molecular interaction in solution state as well as enhanced solid state ordering. However, higher FTh content leads to unfavorable decrease in polymer solubility. When incorporated into all-polymer solar cells (all-PSCs) using PT8 as the donor, the crystallinity between donor and acceptor polymer was optimized using random copolymer strategy, and a best PCE of 9.04% was achieved with 10% FTh substitution, which is among the highest reports of wide bandgap all-PSCs. We believe that these findings will further provide insight into the control of polymer-polymer blend with desirable optoelectronic properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据