4.7 Article

Surface fluorinated Ce-doped TiO2 nanostructure photocatalyst: A trap and remove strategy to enhance the VOC removal from indoor air environment

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 401, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125932

关键词

Anatase-brookite; Ce-TiO2; Fluorinated Ce-TiO2; Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK); UV light photocatalysis; Visible light photocatalysis

资金

  1. Concordia University
  2. Concordia Research Chair Energy Environment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of cerium-doped TiO2 anatase-brookite polymorphs with different low Ce contents (0.2-1.5 atomic %) were synthesized by a facile hydrothermal method as efficient visible-light-driven photocatalysts. Then, the surface fluorination of the Ce-TiO2 photocatalyst with optimum Ce content (0.5%Ce-TiO2) was studied further to increase its efficiency, particularly in high humid conditions. After coating of the synthesized photocatalysts on nickel foam, their photocatalytic performance was investigated in a continuous-flow reactor with small residence time through methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) degradation. Based on the characterization results, using an appropriate amount of Ce dopant and surface fluorination can significantly inhibit the charge carrier recombination. A significant improvement (about 4 times) in visible-driven photocatalytic activity has been demonstrated for F-0.5%Ce-TiO2 compared to P25. Specifically, the surface fluorination promoted the 0.5%Ce-TiO2 photoactivity in high humid conditions (e.g., 40% and 60%). After surface fluorination, removal efficiency of 0.5%Ce-TiO2 at RH = 60% improved from 52% to 60% under UV and from 47% to 54% under visible light irradiation. The MEK removal efficiency for one-layer and three-layer of 0.5%Ce-TiO2 photocatalyst are respectively 62% and 79% under UV, and 56% and 75% under visible light irradiation. Notably, the by-product generation was considerably decreased and reached the lowest amount for the three-layer F-0.5%Ce-TiO2 photocatalyst.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据