4.7 Article

Application of a heterogeneous physical model for the adsorption of Cd2+, Ni2+, Zn2+ and Cu2+ ions on flamboyant pods functionalized with citric acid

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 417, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127975

关键词

Adsorption; Biomass; Heavy metals; Heterogeneous physical model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A heterogeneous physical model with two binding sites successfully explained the adsorption of Cd2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, and Cu2+ ions on flamboyant pods functionalized with citric acid, highlighting the crucial roles of specific functional groups in the adsorbent. Adsorption was more effective at high temperatures, suggesting an endothermic process associated with physisorption, making it suitable for treating water pollution by heavy metal ions.
A heterogeneous physical model with two bindings sites (HPMTBS) was successfully used to explain the adsorption of Cd2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, and Cu2+ ions on flamboyant pods functionalized with citric acid. Experimental results and statistical physics modeling showed that carboxylic and phenolic functionalities of this adsorbent played a relevant role for the adsorption of Cd2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, and Cu2+ ions. Calculations performed with HPMTBS suggested that the removal of these cations was a multi-ionic adsorption process at tested operating conditions. This adsorbent was more effective to remove Cd2+, Ni2+, Zn2+ and Cu2+ ions at high solution temperatures thus indicating an endothermic process with adsorption energies ranging from 20.3 to 29.5 kJ/mol, which were associated to physisorption. The total adsorption capacities varied from 0.10 to 0.32, 0.28 to 0.39, 0.19 to 0.25 and 0.20 to 0.31 mmol/g for Cd2+, Ni2+, Zn2+ and Cu2+, respectively. This difference in adsorption capacities could be attributed to the ionic radius of tested adsorbates. This functionalized biomass can be considered as an alternative adsorbent for facing water pollution by heavy metal ions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据