4.7 Article

A basic comprehensive study on synergetic effects among the metal oxides in CeO2-WO3/TiO2 NH3-SCR catalyst

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 421, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127833

关键词

CeO2-WO3/TiO2; Solid solutions; Active sites; NH3-SCR

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0211202]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51702215]
  3. Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province [2020C01134, LGG19B070002]
  4. National Training Programs of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates [202010349023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the formation of solid solutions and high specific surface area in catalysts would increase the amounts of Ce3+, oxygen vacancies, and acid sites, broadening the operating temperature window of NH3-SCR reaction. This enhances N-2 selectivity by promoting fast SCR reaction at low temperatures and inhibiting the unselective oxidation of NH3 at high temperatures.
Two Ce-W-Ti mixed oxide catalysts were prepared by wet impregnation (CeW/Ti-I) and mechanical mixing (Ce/W/Ti-M) methods. CeW/Ti-I catalyst exhibits over 80% NOx conversion and nearly 100% N-2 selectivity at 200-550 degrees C. The superior catalytic performance is associated with the high dispersion of active CeO2 and acidic WO3 on TiO2 and the synergistic effects among different components. The X-ray Diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, Nitrogen physisorption, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, H-2 temperature-programmed reduction, temperature-programmed desorption of ammonia and infrared spectroscopy were performed. It is found that the formation of solid solutions, as well as the high specific surface area, would increase the amounts of Ce3+, oxygen vacancies and acid sites in the catalyst. These broaden the operating temperature window of NH3-SCR reaction and enhance the N-2 selectivity by facilitating fast SCR reaction at low temperatures and inhibiting the unselective oxidation of NH3 at high temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据