4.7 Article

3D hierarchically porous NiO/NF electrode for the removal of chromium(VI) from wastewater by electrocoagulation

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 402, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126151

关键词

NiO/NF; Annealing atmosphere; Electrocoagulation; Hexavalent chromium; HER

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21878257, 51402209]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province [201701D221083]
  3. Key Research and Development Program of Shanxi Province [201803D421079, 201803D31042]
  4. Scientific and Technological Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi [2016124, 2019L0156]
  5. Shanxi Provincial Key Innovative Research Team in Science and Technology [201605D131045-10]
  6. Joint Open Fund of Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Ecological Building Materials and Environmental Protection Equipment [JH201817]
  7. Key Laboratory for Advanced Technology in Environmental Protection of Jiangsu Province [JH201817]
  8. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [A1920502051907-15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

3D hierarchically porous NiO/NF (Ni foam) was synthesized by a facile hydrothermal method and a subsequent annealing process in different atmospheres for the simultaneous Cr(VI) removal and hydrogen generation from wastewater by the electrocoagulation method. O-2 atmosphere for annealing increased the Ni3+ content in NiO, thus led to an enhanced electrostatic interaction with Cr(VI)/OH- anions and subsequently increased the Cr(VI) adsorption and Ni hydroxide flocculant production. Thus, the NiO-O-2/NF electrode exhibited the best Cr(VI) removal performance of 99.5% within 20 min at the applied potential of 0.97 V vs. RHE, along with a hydrogen generation rate of 1.1 mmol g(-1) h(-1). The removal mechanism was suggested, including the reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III), direct complexation reactions with the freshly produced amorphous Ni hydroxides, and adsorption on NiO-X/NF electrodes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据