4.7 Article

Microstructure and superior mechanical property of in situ (TiBw plus TiCp)/ Ti composites with laminated structure

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 47, 期 8, 页码 11423-11431

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.269

关键词

Titanium matrix composites; Spark plasma sintering; Microstructure; Laminated structure; Strength-ductility synergy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51901191, U1737108]
  2. Key Research and Development Projects of Shaanxi Province, China [2019GY-199, 2020GY292]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The strength and ductility of titanium matrix composites (TMCs) often show a trade-off, but this study successfully achieved a balance between strength and ductility through specific processing methods. By using electrophoretic depositing and spark plasma sintering, a laminated titanium composite with high strength and good ductility was created.
The strength and ductility of titanium matrix composites (TMCs) hardly co-exist and show a trade-off between each other. In order to balance the strength and ductility of TMCs, in situ TiB whiskers (TiBw) and TiC particles (TiCp) strengthened Ti composites with laminated structure were constructed via electrophoretic depositing (EPD) boron (B) powders + graphene oxides (GOs) on pure Ti foils followed by spark plasma sintering (SPS). The experiment results reveal that increasing EPD duration leads to more synthesized TiBw + TiCp reinforcements accompanied by decreased grain size of Ti matrix in the sintered composites, which favorably results in gradually enhanced strength. A maximum yield strength (YS) of 569 MPa is achieved in the laminated composite, which is 75.6% higher than that of pure Ti sample (YS: 324 MPa). Meanwhile, the composite still owns a relatively higher elongation of 12.0%. The achievement of good ductility should benefit from the laminated architecture which exerts constraint effect on crack propagation. This work provides a short cut to achieve strength-ductility synergy in TMCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据