4.7 Article

Microstructure and mechanical behaviour of transient liquid phase spark plasma sintered B4C-SiC-TiB2 composites from a B4C-TiSi2 system

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 47, 期 8, 页码 10665-10671

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.180

关键词

B4C-SiC-TiB2 composites; TiSi2; Spark plasma sintering; Mechanical properties; Toughening mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51621091, 51772062]
  2. Heilongjiang Touyan Innovation Team Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fully-dense B4C-SiC-TiB2 composites with high strength and toughness were successfully prepared through in-situ reactive spark plasma sintering using B4C and TiSi2 as raw materials. TiSi2 was confirmed as a reactive sintering additive that promoted densification, while SiC-TiB2 agglomerates played a critical role in improving toughness in the composite material.
Almost fully-dense B4C-SiC-TiB2 composites with a high combination of strength and toughness were prepared through in situ reactive spark plasma sintering using B4C and TiSi2 as raw materials. The densification, microstructure, mechanical properties, reaction, and toughening mechanisms were explored. TiSi2 was confirmed as a reactive sintering additive to promote densification via transient liquid-phase sintering. Specifically, Si formed via the reaction between B4C and TiSi2 that served as a transient component contributed to densification when it melted and then reacted with C to yield more SiC. Toughening mechanisms, including crack deflection, branching and bridging, could be observed due to the residual stresses induced by the thermoelastic mismatches. Particularly, the introduced SiC-TiB2 agglomerates composed of interlocked SiC and TiB2 played a critical role in improving toughness. Accordingly, the B4C-SiC-TiB2 composite created with B4C-16 wt% TiSi2 achieved excellent mechanical performance, containing a Vickers hardness of 33.5 GPa, a flexural strength of 608.7 MPa and a fracture toughness of 6.43 MPa m(1/2).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据