4.7 Article

Using ductile cores for enhancing the mechanical performance of hollow strut β-TCP scaffolds fabricated by digital light processing

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 47, 期 7, 页码 10163-10173

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.165

关键词

Composite scaffolds; Ceramic; Polymer; Mechanical properties; Digital light processing; Finite element method

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades
  2. European Regional Development Funds (MINECO/FEDER, UE) [MAT2015-64670-R]
  3. European Regional Development Funds (MCIU/AEI/FEDER, UE) [RTI2018-095566-B-I00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hybrid scaffolds were fabricated using Digital Light Processing to create a three-dimensional network of hollow struts made of beta-tricalcium phosphate with cores filled with polycaprolactone. The compressive strength and toughness of the scaffolds were enhanced after infiltration, with further analysis conducted on the effect of core diameter on mechanical performance. Finite element analysis was also utilized to study the impact of core/shell diameters and the core material's modulus on the strength of the hybrid structure.
Hybrid scaffolds consisting of a three-dimensional network of hollow struts of beta-tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP) with cores filled with polycaprolactone (PCL) were fabricated. For the development of the ceramic structures the additive manufacturing technique known as Digital Light Processing (DLP) was employed. After sintering, cores were infiltrated with molten PCL by suction. The enhancement of the scaffolds' compressive strength and toughness upon infiltration was evaluated through uniaxial compression tests. The effect of the core diameter on the mechanical performance was also analyzed. Moreover, a comprehensive finite element analysis was carried out to broaden the study on the effect of core/shell respective diameters and to analyze the role of the modulus of the core material on the strength of the hybrid structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据